7 responses so far ↓

• 1 Rice // Apr 23, 2008 at 10:07 am

  This is confusing. Keep it up.

• 2 Grant Gould // Apr 23, 2008 at 10:22 am

  You only call it hackery because you want America to lose!

  What an astonishingly odd (and revealing) bit of hackery.

• 3 Grant Gould // Apr 23, 2008 at 10:24 am

  Hm. I read that Obama is a White Sox fan. Surely if he really wanted to lose, he’d be a Cubs fan…

• 4 southpaw // Apr 23, 2008 at 10:39 am

  I dissent from this policy. You should eviscerate the hacks, especially Schiffren, with wit and pith.

  Don’t just link to them. Jump up and down on their heads and make their inadequacy famous.

• 5 Franklin Harris // Apr 23, 2008 at 11:16 am

  An NRO writer likens Hillary to America to Israel?

  Now I’ve seen everything.

• 6 Will // Apr 23, 2008 at 3:25 pm

  Any chance you could post a response to this article on FISA reform from NRO:

  http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Y2EzMjk0M2NhZWY4N2IxM2Y1NTc0NzFhNWMyZWNmNzU=

  I’m not sure if you take “requests,” but I’d be interested to hear your take on McCarthy’s interpretation of the Ninth Circuit’s ruling. Should this precedent even apply to electronic communications?

• 7 Kevin B. O'Reilly // Apr 23, 2008 at 6:37 pm

  Perhaps my hackometer isn’t as finely tuned as yours, but I haven’t found any of the links provided in this series so far to be self-evidently hacktastic. I agree with southpaw — put forth a little effort, man!