Within the last week, two things happened: I finally got around to checking out the Fox show Fringe, the first season of which I noticed sitting tantalizingly in the Playstation Store, and my Ars colleague Erica Sadun wrote an article exploring all the delightful little Easter eggs sprinkled throughout the show. In particular she devotes some special attention to the so-called “glyph code”—a series of weird images flanked by glowing dots that appear as interstitial bumpers before commercial breaks. If I hadn’t been way nerdy for crypto before I started writing about the NSA habitually, that certainly pushed me over the edge, and I couldn’t resist taking a stab myself.
Now, here’s the part that pains me just a bit: Erica did a whole bunch of work that ultimately enabled me to crack the thing in a couple of minutes, but stopped just a hair short of the solution. From where she left off, it’s actually incredibly simple once you make one crucial assumption. Alas, there’s no deep dark mystery about the show’s arc concealed here, and the solution’s actually a bit anticlimactic, but it’s below the fold for those who are interested.
So the code is nothing fancy: It’s a simple one-to-one, monoalphabetic substitution cypher. But it’s isolated words, not a sentence, so handy strings like “the” or “and” don’t recur. Crucially, there are a couple of letters missing from Erica’s transcription of the pilot episode glyphs and possibly an extra glyph for episode 3, at least as compared with the list here. Also, it looks like there was a flub in the glyphs aired for episode 5. Throw a couple errors into the mix and a dictionary attack on a string of characters with no breaks becomes computationally infeasible. (If you want a reasonably quick result from your laptop, anyway.) But it’s trivial if you know where the word breaks are.
Well, by “trivial” I mean “trivial when someone else has already written a really solid algorithm for brute-forcing a ciphertext with a probability-weighted wordlist, and you can just use their code.” The “someone” in this case is UC Irvine computer science prof David Eppstein, whose program and dictionary made short work of the string I gave it despite several errors in that ciphertext. Basically, Eppstein and Erica Sadun did all the real work here, and I combined the products of their efforts with a few minor tweaks. [Update: And it strikes me I’m being sloppy here; “brute force” implies blindly running through possible keys and checking against a dictionary, which is emphatically not how Eppstein’s very elegant program works—the curious should just read his explanation.]
Sometimes the answers that seem too obvious are correct: Each episode yields a single word, in most cases relating to a central theme of the episode. Glancing around the Internets, it looks like the key omission some other folks trying to solve it were making was a failure to take into account the orientation of the image and the position of the glowing dot that appears with each. If you don’t factor those in, of course, the cipher seems insoluble because you’re counting a whole series of distinct symbols as a single glyph. Anyway, the solutions for the episodes to date are:
1: OBSERVER
2: CHILD
3: AEGER [Latin for “sick”]
4: ROGUE
5: SURGG [should be SURGE?]
6: CELLS
7: CODES
8: TAKEN
9: VOICE
10: TRADE
11: SAVED
12: BISHOP
13: AVIAN
14: OLIVIA
For those who want to play along at home, that makes the letter-to-glyph assignment as below. Not all letters have been assigned glyphs yet, obviously.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Between cracking that and writing this post, I’ve probably given this an hour, which is really more than enough, but if someone wants to Photoshop those together into a translation grid for easy reference so people can transcribe the word for the episode as they watch, I’ll happily post it here. (Done! See update below.)
Eyeballing the incomplete key so far, there do seem to be some obvious glyph clusters, and I should note the possibility that solving the substitution cipher is only step one. Think, for instance, of those acrostic puzzles you sometimes see in the New York Times Magazine, where you fill in responses to a series of clues, then rearrange the letters into an adjacent grid to form a quotation. For purposes of cryptanalysis we can just treat each glyph as though it were a distinct letter chosen at random. But the glyphs actually have internal structure too. They’re a combination of three features: Image, orientation (i.e. each image has a mirror version) and one of (at least) three positions for those glowing dots. Cracking the cipher puts those symbols in a natural order; conceivably there’s some further puzzle to be solved by analysis of that series. Or possibly not… again, I’ve probably given this one too much energy for now, but others might want to give it a look.
Update: Dennis at FringeTelevision has gone ahead and gotten his Photoshop on, producing a lovely, suitable-for-framing key to the glyph cipher. Apparently there’s a new episode tonight, and while I’ll have to wait for it to show up in the PS3 store, those of you with advanced “receiver” technology for your TVs can print out a copy and see what the magic word of the day is:
You can get a bigger version at the link above, or another printer-friendly key from the folks at Fringe Podcast.
322 responses so far ↓
1 Eduardo Martínez-Abarca // Jan 28, 2016 at 6:23 am
And more secrets.
In the 13th episode of season two, the molecule causing deaths, appears in the computer screen.
Well, attached to the molecule, is the seahorse glyph.
2 Eduardo Martínez-Abarca // Jan 28, 2016 at 6:30 am
…
3 jessie367 // Mar 17, 2016 at 4:41 am
5T7onh https://twitter.com/Healty_Pills
4 Distractions et narration interactive #2 - Interactivité & Transmedia | Interactivité & Transmedia // Mar 27, 2016 at 11:25 am
[…] derrière les glyphes de la série Fringe aura longtemps entretenu les spéculations des fans avant d’être enfin percé. Un schéma similaire a été développé pour la saison 3 d’Hero Corp: des contenus additionnels […]
5 steroids // Jun 2, 2016 at 12:52 pm
…[Trackback]
[…]I am not positive the place you’re getting your information, but great topic.[…]
6 qploanz // Oct 2, 2016 at 1:50 am
…Websites you should visit
[…]you make blogging glance[…]
7 malt // Dec 13, 2016 at 9:37 pm
what does the hand with a dot on the right mean?
end picture of episode 13 season 2
8 Setcxqx // Jan 13, 2017 at 6:21 am
купить в москве дженерики виагра сиалис левитра купить дженерики виагра сиалис левитра софосбувир дженерик купить дженерик левитра купить купить дженерики недорого дженерик екатеринбург купить
http://stoyak.men
9 Setuhdx // Jan 13, 2017 at 7:14 am
http://infoblog.win/
10 Setywcg // Jan 28, 2017 at 12:41 am
купить даклатасвир дженерик софосбувир дженерик купить виагра дженерики купить в москве купить дешевые дженерики дженерики купить рф дженерик левитра купить
http://stoyak.men
11 Setwajz // Jan 28, 2017 at 2:21 am
http://impotenciinet.site/
12 Setgkkv // Jan 28, 2017 at 3:11 am
http://potenciaru.website
13 Wetkmwq // Jan 28, 2017 at 4:03 am
Praziquantel Dog Dosage Praziquantel Veterinary Use Praziquantel Jejum Praziquantel Vs Drontal Praziquantel Tapeworm Tabs For Dogs
http://reviewmeds.site
14 Weturbh // Jan 28, 2017 at 8:58 am
erection pills headache erection pills reviews uk zeus erection pills erection pills walmart erection pills that actually work best erection enhancement pills erection pills for diabetes erection pills online india
http://edtreatblog.site/
15 Wetsmwj // Jan 28, 2017 at 9:48 am
quality erection pills erection medication nz herbal erection pills nz erection pills over the counter uk erection pills chinese
http://menshealthon.website
16 Memtorc // Jan 28, 2017 at 10:40 am
Pharmacy Guam Pharmacy Questions Pharmacy Glasgow Pharmacy Certification Pharmacy Innovations Pharmacy Zephyrhills Fl Pharmacy Act Pharmacy Mall Reviews Pharmacy Benefit Management
hi!
17 Setrpmy // Feb 11, 2017 at 3:09 am
виагра дженерики купить в москве дженерики купить в москве Купить дженерики Купить дженерики дженерики купить в спб сиалис дженерики купить дженерики купить рф
http://stoyak.men
18 Setnjpi // Feb 11, 2017 at 3:58 am
http://infoblog.win/
19 ShaneLooft // Feb 23, 2017 at 4:03 pm
Большинство проблем на сайтах с невысокой посещаемостью можно обнаружить за час-два и поправить за неделю.
Задачи которые я предлагаю решить:
-Диагностировать как продвигает сайт ваш SEO специалист и проверить его компетентность?
-Найду ошибки допущенные раньше и построю программу по исправлению ситуации.
-Продемонстрирую как контролировать работу SEO эксперта.
Хотите пригласить SEO мастера?
-Проведу собеседование потенциальногоSEO специалиста. Разберу по каким критериям оценивать его уровень.
– Опишем различия между нанятым в штат SEO, делегированном SEO и раскрутке сайтов личными средствами.
Планируете своими силами продвинуть имеющийся сайт. Расскажу все насчет продвижения, после консультирования вам станет понятно:
-Как много будет стоить ваш сайт
-Как долго желательно будет его продвигать чтобы достигнуть топов
-Из каких шагов формируется само продвижение, в целом проанализируем каждый из них.
-Проанализируем по какой причине не следует пользоваться услугами фирм, оказывающих список услуг по SEO
Планируете создать веб-сайт и организовать его продвижение?
-Расскажу а также продемонстрирую как спроектировать максимально бюджетный и качественный вариант интернет-сайта.
-Насколько большим или сложным должен быть ваш личный сайт чтобы составлять конкуренцию в топе.
-Как много вкладывают ваши конкуренты в продвижение.
-До какой степени реально войти в топы с вашим веб-сайтом и с вашим бюджетом.
Решили узнать окупится ли консультация?
Позвоните по телефону либо в скайп – я отвечу на любые проблемы касающиеся SEO и предполагаемого интернет-сайта.
Любые вопросы – сделайте звонок +7(921)9114848 или по скайпу admin1.ru
Часовая консультация по стоимости 3тыс руб, допускается подписание договора и платеж на расчетный счет.
Оказываю бесплатные консультации за рекомендации (так например у подавляющего большинства интернет-проектов проблему видно практически сразу)
acol7wns24
20 Diya // Jun 13, 2018 at 5:16 am
Can somebody explain what avian is
21 zydicious // Aug 7, 2018 at 12:00 pm
Avian means “from birds” from the Latin avis. It’s also the base for most words dealing with flying aviation, aviator (pilot), etc.
22 walktubs // Nov 15, 2018 at 5:50 pm
Walk-in tubs can be pricey and Medicare does not consider them Durable Medical Equipment (DME) or cover any part of the costs. A few states may offer some assistance under their Medicaid programs but most do not. The base price of a walk-in tub can range from just under $1,000 to well over $5,000. Installation costs can vary widely, however, with costs after installation running up to $10,000 for the tub and installation, depending on the complexity of the construction needed for installation.
Wheelchair-bound patients can make an easier transition from chair to tub.
https://walk-tubs.com